Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: We studied an inception cohort of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to (1) identify distinct disease courses based on changes over 5 years in 5 variables prioritized by patients, parents, and clinicians; and (2) estimate the probability of a severe disease course for each child at diagnosis. One hundred candidate prediction models were developed in random samples of 75% of the cohort; their reliability and accuracy were tested in the 25% not used in their development. RESULTS: Four distinct courses were identified in 609 subjects. They differed in prioritized variables, disability scores, and probabilities of attaining inactive disease and remission. We named them Mild (43.8% of children), Moderate (35.6%), Severe Controlled (9%), and Severe Persisting (11.5%). A logistic regression model using JIA category, active joint count, and pattern of joint involvement at enrollment best predicted a severe disease course (Controlled + Persisting, c-index = 0.87); 91% of children in the highest decile of risk actually experienced a severe disease course, compared to 5% of those in the lowest decile. CONCLUSION: Children in this JIA cohort followed 1 of 4 disease courses and the probability of a severe disease course could be estimated with information available at diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guzmán et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: