Key result
PRRS virus inoculation fails to infect mice and rats, indicating rodents are not a disease reservoir.
Why the study?
Rodents were investigated as a possible reservoir for PRRS virus because the disease has become enzootic on many farms.
Are mice and rats susceptible to PRRS virus infection and a reservoir for the disease?
Are mice and rats susceptible to PRRS virus infection and a reservoir for the disease?
Mice and rats are not susceptible to PRRS virus infection and are therefore unlikely to be a reservoir for the disease.
Rodents can be excluded from PRRS transmission models; confirms narrow host range and leaves open identification of other reservoirs in field settings.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is caused by an unclassified arterivirus. The syndrome was first reported in the USA in 1987 as epizootics of reproductive failure in sows and respiratory disease in nursery, growing, and fattening pigs. An enzootic form of the disease has now emerged, characterized by interstitial pneumonia and an increased incidence of secondary infections. Because the disease has now become enzootic on many farms, rodents were investigated as a possible reservoir for the infection. Wild rodents from an endemically infected farm were trapped, and virus isolation for PRRS virus (PRRSV) was attempted using porcine primary alveolar macrophage cultures. PRRSV was not isolated from serum and selected pooled tissues (thymus, lung, and spleen) of 14 feral mice and 2 feral rats. Also, transmission experiments were carried out on 3-week-old Balb/c mice and 12-week-old Fischer-344 rats to determine if these species were susceptible to infection. The rodents were inoculated intranasally, orally, and intraperitoneally with a virus proven to transmit PRRS to pigs. Virus isolations from selected pooled tissues (lung, spleen, thymus, and kidney) and from serum were negative, and there were neither gross nor microscopic lesions. Weight gains and white blood cell counts were not significantly different between treated and control groups. These results indicate that rodents are not susceptible to infection with PRRSV and therefore are probably not a reservoir for the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hooper et al. (1994) studied Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). PRRSV inoculation vs. Control group was evaluated on Virus isolation from serum and selected pooled tissues. Inoculation of mice and rats with PRRS virus resulted in negative virus isolations and no lesions, indicating that rodents are not susceptible to infection and are not a reservoir for the disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: