Although great progress has been made in modeling the gas fluidization of Geldart B and D particles and dilute gas−solid flow by standard Eulerian approach, researchers have shown that, because of the limitation of computational resources and the formation of subgrid-scale (SGS) heterogeneous structures, Eulerian model with a suitable SGS model for constitutive law is necessary to simulate the hydrodynamics of large-scale gas-fluidized beds containing Geldart A particles. In this article, a state-of-the-art review of Eulerian modeling of Geldart A particles in gas-fluidized beds is presented. The available methods for establishing SGS models are classified into six categories, that is, empirical correlation method, scaling factor method, structure-based method, modified Syamlal and O’Brien drag correlation method, EMMS-model-based method, and correlative multiscale method. The basic ideas of those methods, as well as their advantages and disadvantages, are reviewed. Finally, directions for future research are indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junwu Wang (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: