Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The numbers of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), Nitrospira and Nitrobacter in a municipal wastewater treatment plant were examined for five months using a real-time PCR quantification technique. The numbers of AOB and Nitrospira were in the ranges of 3.8×1010-2.0×1011 and 4.7×1010-1.6×1011 cell · l-1, respectively. Additionally, the fractional percentages against the number of eubacteria were in the ranges of 2.1-7.6 and 2.6-7.0 %, respectively. Nitrobacter was less than 1 % as common as Nitrospira. On the other hand, the maximum ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing rates obtained from aerobic batch tests ranged from 0.08 to 0.41 and from 0.10 to 0.27 mmol-N · l-1 · hr-1, respectively. No correlation between cell number and maximum rate was observed. The maximum cell-specific ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing rates were then estimated to be in the range of 0.53-5.6 and 1.2-5.4 fmol-N·cell-1 · hr-1, respectively. In other words, even in the same wastewater treatment plant, these maximum cell-specific rates were not unique. To explore the factors controlling the maximum cell-specific ammonia-oxidizing rate, the relationship with in situ ammonia-oxidizing activity per cell was investigated. A fairly good correlation was obtained. The result indicates that the amount of ammonia oxidized per cell controls the maximum cell-specific ammonia-oxidizing rate and is the primary contributor to the variation. Meanwhile, the maximum cell-specific nitrite-oxidizing rate responded to the increase in the maximum cell-specific ammonia-oxidizing rate when the number of Nitrospira was less than that of AOB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujita et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: