Key result
Epicardial accelerometer estimates LV pressure traces with ~0.98 correlation to hemodynamic references.
Why the study?
Measurements of the left ventricular pressure trace are rarely performed despite high clinical interest, motivating development of a noninvasive estimation method.
Does an epicardial accelerometer accurately estimate LV pressure traces compared to hemodynamic reference recordings in an animal model?
Does an epicardial accelerometer accurately estimate LV pressure traces compared to hemodynamic reference recordings in an animal model?
An epicardial accelerometer can accurately detect valve events and estimate LV pressure traces and pressure-displacement loop areas in an animal model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable individualized LV pressure estimation from valve timings; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Measurements of the left ventricular (LV) pressure trace are rarely performed despite high clinical interest. We estimated the LV pressure trace for an individual heart by scaling the isovolumic, ejection and filling phases of a normalized, averaged LV pressure trace to the time-points of opening and closing of the aortic and mitral valves detected in the individual heart. We developed a signal processing algorithm that automatically detected the time-points of these valve events from the motion signal of a miniaturized accelerometer attached to the heart surface. Furthermore, the pressure trace was used in combination with measured displacement from the accelerometer to calculate the pressure-displacement loop area. The method was tested on data from 34 animals during different interventions. The accuracy of the accelerometer-detected valve events was very good with a median difference of 2 ms compared to valve events defined from hemodynamic reference recordings acquired simultaneously with the accelerometer. The average correlation coefficient between the estimated and measured LV pressure traces was r = 0.98. Finally, the LV pressure-displacement loop areas calculated using the estimated and measured pressure traces showed very good correlation (r = 0.98). Hence, the pressure-displacement loop area can be assessed solely from accelerometer recordings with very good accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wajdan et al. (2020) studied Cardiac function monitoring (n=34). Epicardial accelerometer-based automatic detection of valve events vs. Invasive hemodynamic reference recordings was evaluated on Correlation between estimated and measured LV pressure traces and pressure-displacement loop areas (r = 0.98). An epicardial accelerometer automatically detected valve events with a median difference of 2 ms compared to hemodynamic references, allowing estimation of left ventricular pressure traces and pressure-displacement loop areas with a correlation of r = 0.98.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: