) using sealed infusion glass vials, filled syringes for bolus injections and infusion bags. Each concentration was analyzed at eight different positions. These measurement positions were chosen randomly to account for signal variability arising from local material variations, including inhomogeneities in wall thickness and curvature. For all tested drug substances and packaging types and materials, relative prediction errors remained within ±10% across the clinically relevant concentration range, with a RMSECV of 1.07 mg mL⁻¹ for cyclophosphamide and 0.54 mg mL⁻¹ for gemcitabine. As routine quality control of individually compounded antineoplastic formulations lacks standardized final-product verification, non-invasive through-container spectroscopic analysis offers the possibility to add identity and concentration confirmation without opening or sampling the CMR-classified formulation. This method preserves the integrity of the final drug product while reducing costs and the risk of occupational exposure for pharmacy personnel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegmund et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: