Key result
Atrial fibrillation fails to predict discharge functional status in hip fracture patients.
Why the study?
Possible differences in rehabilitation outcomes of hip fracture patients with and without atrial fibrillation were unclear.
Does atrial fibrillation worsen rehabilitation outcomes in elderly hip fracture patients?
Cohort (n=1,114)
Does atrial fibrillation worsen rehabilitation outcomes in elderly hip fracture patients?
Atrial fibrillation does not adversely affect functional rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients following hip fracture surgery.
AF does not worsen short-term rehab outcomes after hip fracture; leaves open whether it affects longer-term recovery or other populations.
AIM: To study possible differences in rehabilitation outcomes of patients with hip fracture, with and without atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprising 1114 patients, divided into three groups: patients with sinus rhythm, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial fibrillation. All patients underwent a standard orthogeriatric care comprising surgical hip repair and a rehabilitation course. Main outcome measures included functional status at discharge by the Functional Independence Measure, post-fracture functional status category and type of postdischarge living arrangement. RESULTS: Patients with atrial fibrillation differed from patients in sinus rhythm by female sex (P = 0.018), older age (P = 0.008) and higher rates of heart failure (P < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (P < 0.001), previous stroke (P < 0.001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < 0.001). No differences were observed among the three groups regarding Functional Independence Measure motor and total scores. In regression analysis, Mini-Mental State Examination (P < 0.001), prefracture status (P < 0.001), postsurgery motor Functional Independence Measure (P < 0.0001) and Parkinson's disease (P = 0.009) were predictive of higher motor Functional Independence Measure at discharge, whereas atrial fibrillation had no predictive value whatsoever. There were no differences among groups in magnitude of postfracture change of functional status category or type of postdischarge living arrangement. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge motor Functional Independence Measure scores, postfracture changes in functional status and in discharge placement are similar in hip fracture patients with sinus rhythm, compared with those with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation should not be considered to adversely affect the rehabilitation outcome of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adunsky et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Hip fracture (n=1,114). Atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on Functional status at discharge by the Functional Independence Measure, post-fracture functional status category and type of postdischarge living arrangement. Atrial fibrillation had no predictive value for discharge motor Functional Independence Measure scores in hip fracture patients, unlike prefracture status (P<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: