Key result
Using a novel life table model to account for varying entry ages and loss to follow-up, subjects in the highest quartile of age-normalized common carotid intimal medial thickness had significantly higher total mortality, with an age difference of 3.9 years compared to the lowest quartile.
Why the study?
The predictive value of Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) for total mortality and the benefit of a novel life table statistical model to analyze varying ages in a cohort were evaluated.
Does Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) predict total mortality in subjects without smoking or coronary disease?
Cohort (n=1,470)
No
Does Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) predict total mortality in subjects without smoking or coronary disease?
CIMT measurements, when analyzed with a novel life table model to correct for age differences, effectively predict long-term total mortality in subjects without smoking or coronary disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports age-normalized CIMT for mortality prediction in low-risk subjects; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) is an ultrasound estimate of preclinical atherosclerosis. The Charlottesville CIMT trial entered 1470 subjects from 1995 to 2011 and assessed total mortality in 2024 with a mean 15-year follow-up. In those subjects who reported no smoking or coronary disease, Cox statistics revealed that the presence of plaque and 4 th quartile common, bulb and internal CIMT measurements predicted total mortality (compared to the 1 st quartile). Age-normalized CIMT quartiles were less predictive. The age of subjects in the 4 th quartile was 15 years higher than the 1 st quartile. To correct for different ages, a novel life table model was created to analyze clinical data from a cohort who entered a trial at varying ages. This life table model allowed inclusion of subjects lost to follow-up. With this life table model, age-normalized 4 th and 3 rd quartile common, bulb and internal CIMT predicted total mortality. These data show the utility of measuring CIMT to predict mortality and the benefit of the life table model. The output statistic of the life table model, Age Difference, is an easily understandable and relevant measure of effect size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher M. Rembold (2025) conducted a cohort in Preclinical atherosclerosis (n=1,470). Age-normalized Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness (4th quartile) vs. 1st quartile Age-normalized Carotid Intimal Medial Thickness was evaluated on Total mortality (Age Difference 3.9 years, p=<0.001). Using a novel life table model to account for varying entry ages and loss to follow-up, subjects in the highest quartile of age-normalized common carotid intimal medial thickness had significantly higher total mortality, with an age difference of 3.9 years compared to the lowest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: