Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observations on geographical distribution, cytotypes, crossability, and meiotic chromosome behavior in intra- and interspecific F1 hybrids revealed that the complexes of Glycine tabacina (2n = 40, 80) and G. tomentella (2n = 38, 40, 78, 80) evolved through allopolyploidization. It is apparent from this study that 80-chromosome tabacinas are composed of two distinct morphological complexes having one common genome: with and without adventitious roots. In contrast, the tomentellas are inseparable morphologically. They are composed of accessions with at least three genomic complexes: (i) 2n = 80, accessions from Australia and Taiwan; (ii) 2n = 80, an accession from Papua New Guinea; and (iii) 2n = 78, accessions from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Hybrids within each group showed complete synapsis and set normal seeds; however, hybrids between the groups apparently differed by one genome and were completely sterile. Chromosome pairing in triploid interspecific F1 hybrids (2n = 59, 60) indicated that G. canescens (2n = 40) was probably the donor of the common genome for 80-chromosome tabacinas and tomentellas. Glycine latifolia (2n = 40) appears to have contributed its genome to G. tabacina (2n = 80) but could not have participated in the speciation of 80-chromosome tomentellas. Likewise, the 38-chromosome G. tomentella has no genomic affinity with 80-chromosome tabacinas but has complete affinity with 80-chromosome tomentellas. On the basis of present findings and the results published earlier, the evolution of the genus Glycine will be discussed. Key words: Glycine spp., genome, hybridization (intraspecific), hybridization (interspecific), speciation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: