Key result
VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS linked to ~19% higher 6-month survival versus non-COVID viral pneumonia.
Why the study?
Does VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS result in different 6-month mortality compared to VV-ECMO for non-COVID-19 viral ARDS?
Cohort
No
Does VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS result in different 6-month mortality compared to VV-ECMO for non-COVID-19 viral ARDS?
Absolute Event Rate: 84.9% vs 66%
p-value: p=0.040
Survival at 6 months for COVID-19 ARDS patients managed with VV-ECMO is at least as good as, and potentially better than, historical cohorts with non-COVID-19 viral ARDS.
VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS was associated with higher 6-month survival than historical viral ARDS; leaves open need for prospective confirmation before changing selection.
A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with high risk of death. The efficacy of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes, unlike in other viral pneumonias, is unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the 6 month mortality of patients receiving VV-ECMO support for COVID-19 with a historical viral ARDS cohort. Fifty-three consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted for VV-ECMO to the Royal Brompton Hospital between March 17, 2020 and May 30, 2020 were identified. Mortality, patient characteristics, complications, and ECMO parameters were then compared to a historical cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. At 6 months survival was significantly higher in the COVID-19 than in the non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia cohort (84.9% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.040). Patients with COVID-19 had an increased Murray score (3.50 vs. 3.25, p = 0.005), a decreased burden of organ dysfunction (sequential organ failure score score [8.76 vs. 10.42, p = 0.004]), an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (69.8% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001) and in those who survived to decannulation longer ECMO runs (19 vs. 11 days, p = 0.001). Our results suggest that survival in patients supported with EMCO for COVID-19 are at least as good as those treated for non-COVID-19 viral ARDS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garfield et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 ARDS. COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia was evaluated on 6 month survival (p=0.040). Patients receiving VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS had significantly higher 6-month survival compared to a historical cohort with non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia (84.9% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.040).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: