Key result
Non-invasive intraocular pressure measurement reveals the impact of high vascular resistance on ocular blood flow.
Why the study?
Precise instantaneous digital measurement of intraocular pressure provides a clinical window to study vascular physiology changes in ocular blood flow related to vascular resistance.
Can precise instantaneous digital measurement of intraocular pressure assess ocular blood flow changes in patients with increased vascular resistance?
Case Report
Can precise instantaneous digital measurement of intraocular pressure assess ocular blood flow changes in patients with increased vascular resistance?
Non-invasive digital measurement of intraocular pressure can illustrate changes in ocular blood flow due to external and internal vascular resistance.
May support non-invasive IOP curve analysis for ocular hemodynamics; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical role.
Precise instantaneous digital measurement of intraocular pressure done non-invasively is a clinical window to the vascular physiology of the eye. This technique has been used to study the pulse amplitude/intraocular pressure curve in 2 distinct clinical entities. The first is amaurosis fugax before and after carotid endarterectomy. This demonstrates the effects of high vascular resistance external to the eye on the ocular blood flow. The second is a patient with long-standing arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This is an illustration of increased vascular resistance within the eye.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Schilder (1989) conducted a case report in Amaurosis fugax and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. High vascular resistance external and internal to the eye was evaluated on Pulse amplitude/intraocular pressure curve. Non-invasive measurement of the pulse amplitude/intraocular pressure curve demonstrated the effects of high vascular resistance external and internal to the eye on ocular blood flow.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: