Key result
Continuing DAPT is linked to ~46% lower death or MI in hemodialysis patients post-DES.
Why the study?
The benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation in patients on hemodialysis were unclear.
Does prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (>6 months) reduce death and myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation?
Case-Control
Does prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (>6 months) reduce death and myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation?
Odds Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.36–0.81)
p-value: p=0.003
Extended DAPT beyond 6 months after DES implantation in hemodialysis patients does not appear to provide additional clinical benefit for preventing death or MI.
Extended DAPT beyond 6 months was not associated with lower MI/death in hemodialysis patients post-DES; leaves open optimal duration pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients undergoing hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested case-control analysis of patients on hemodialysis after receipt of DES and DAPT treatment was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2007-2011. Cases of myocardial infarction or death within 1 year after DES implantation were matched one-to-one with control patients. Odds ratios were calculated to compare DAPT continuation with discontinuation. Additionally, a propensity score-adjusted 6-month landmark cohort analysis was also conducted to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of prolonged (>6 months) compared with ≤6 months of DAPT use. The primary outcomes were death and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, patients who continued DAPT had a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P=0.003), whereas this association became statistically nonsignificant when compared with patients who discontinued DAPT for the period between 6 and 12 months after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.04). In the propensity score-adjusted cohort analysis, >6 months of DAPT use was not associated with different primary or secondary outcomes than shorter-term use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the clinical effectiveness of extended DAPT in a hemodialysis population may be tempered after 6 months post-DES implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Hemodialysis after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) continuation vs. DAPT discontinuation was evaluated on Death and myocardial infarction (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81, p=0.003). Continuing dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation in hemodialysis patients (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.36-0.81; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: