Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study evaluate horizontal and vertical accuracy of seven open-source digital elevation models (DEMs) having moderate-to-high resolutions viz. 30 m Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM1), Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global DEM (ASTER GDEM), Advanced Land Observing Satellite World 3D (AW3D30), and Cartosat DEM (CartoDEM), 90 m TerraSAR-X add-on for Digital Elevation Measurement (TanDEM-X), 12.5 m terrain corrected Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) from Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) and 8 m High Mountain Asia (HMA) over the rugged mountainous terrain of the Karakoram region. Horizontal accuracy (specified in x and y) assessed by referring photogrammetrically generated master DEM from Cartosat-1 revealed AW3D30 as the most consistent DEM with a slight shift of +2.80 m and −4.89 m in x and y direction, respectively. However, vertical accuracy analysis showed that both HMA and AW3D30 DEMs are quite close to each other with MAE of 3.01 m and 3.46 m, RMSE of 5.6 m and 7.5 m, and NMAD of 4.09 m and 5.5 m, respectively. We also examined the influence of slope on DEM errors and associated elevation-dependent bias over non-glaciated surface which can be valuable input for geodetic mass balance estimations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: