Key result
VA-ECMO provides life-saving circulatory support and bridges to myocardial recovery in refractory intraoperative VF.
Why the study?
Refractory ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in younger patients are rare, life-threatening events with limited data on the role of ECMO as a life-saving intervention.
Case Report (n=1)
No
VA-ECMO combined with IABP and ICD can serve as a successful bridge to myocardial recovery and prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock.
May support VA-ECMO in refractory intraoperative VF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Refractory ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in younger patients are rare, life-threatening events, particularly when standard resuscitation fails. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides temporary circulatory support, enabling hemodynamic stabilization, myocardial recovery, and time for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. We report the case of a 40-year-old East African woman, medically free at baseline, who developed refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) and cardiogenic shock during elective myomectomy on 12th August 2024. She underwent 45 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before the return of spontaneous circulation. Echocardiography revealed severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF) of approximately 10%. Veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) was initiated 15 hours after the first VF episode on 13th August 2024 per institutional protocols; support continued for six days until 19th August 2024. During ECMO, coronary assessment, continuous rhythm monitoring, and serial echocardiography were performed to guide management and systematically exclude reversible causes, including ischemia, myocarditis, embolic events, and electrolyte disturbances. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was added on 14th August 2024 and removed on 20th August 2024. Post-event discussions revealed a previously unrecognized strong family history of sudden cardiac death. Despite maximal antiarrhythmic therapy, recurrent VF and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) persisted. A temporary pacemaker was inserted on 30th August 2024, and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was placed for secondary prevention, risk stratification, and management of persistent diagnostic uncertainty. Genetic testing was performed due to the newly discovered family history, including a long QT gene panel (ordered 5th September 2024, reported 31st October 2024) and proband whole exome sequencing (WES; ordered 5th September 2024, reported 27th February 2025). WES identified a heterozygous likely pathogenic variant in the AIP gene and two variants of uncertain significance in TTN, while the long QT panel was negative; none fully explained the arrhythmia. Familial screening and clinical correlation were recommended. The patient achieved full recovery, with normalization of cardiac function and improved strain parameters by hospital discharge. This case highlights VA-ECMO as a bridge to myocardial recovery in refractory arrhythmias, underscores systematic exclusion of reversible triggers, and demonstrates that combined ECMO, IABP, and ICD therapy can be life-saving in preventing recurrent cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fadl et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Refractory ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock (n=1). Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was evaluated on Survival and recovery of cardiac function. Veno-arterial ECMO provided life-saving temporary circulatory support and a bridge to myocardial recovery in a 40-year-old woman with refractory intraoperative ventricular fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: