Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The histone domain of macro-H2A, which constitutes the N-terminal one third of this histone variant, is only 64% identical to major H2A. We have shown previously that the main structural differences in a nucleosome in which both H2A moieties have been replaced by macro-H2A reside in the only point of contact between the two histone dimers, the L1-L1 interface of macro-H2A. Here we show that the L1 loop of macro-H2A is responsible for the increased salt-dependent stability of the histone octamer, with implications for the nucleosome assembly pathway. It is unknown whether only one or both of the H2A-H2B dimers within a nucleosome are replaced with H2A variant containing nucleosomes in vivo. We demonstrate that macro-H2A preferentially forms hybrid nucleosomes containing one chain each of major H2A and macro-HA in vitro. The 2.9-A crystal structure of such a hybrid nucleosome shows significant structural differences in the L1-L1 interface when comparing with homotypic major H2A- and macro-H2A-containing nucleosomes. Both homotypic and hybrid macro-nucleosome core particles (NCPs) are resistant to chaperone-assisted H2A-H2B dimer exchange. Together, our findings suggest that the histone domain of macro-H2A modifies the dynamic properties of the nucleosome. We propose that the possibility of forming hybrid macro-NCP adds yet another level of complexity to variant nucleosome structure and function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakravarthy et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: