Key result
Deep brain stimulation hardware infections decline ~66% over time.
Why the study?
Infection of hardware after deep brain stimulation surgery is a serious complication with significant clinical consequences, and its incidence and management require further characterization.
What is the incidence and management of hardware infections after deep brain stimulation surgery?
Cohort (n=270)
No
What is the incidence and management of hardware infections after deep brain stimulation surgery?
Hardware infections after deep brain stimulation occur in nearly 10% of patients, but hardware can often be completely or partly salvaged.
Declining DBS hardware infection rates may inform current risk estimates; leaves open optimal prevention strategies pending prospective data.
AIMS: Infection of hardware is a serious complication after deep brain stimulation (DBS), as this may result in additional surgery, cost and loss of treatment benefit for the patient. We report the incidence and management of infections after DBS in a single institution over the past 11 years. METHODS: A database of 270 patients with 484 implants was used in the study. Incidence, clinical characteristics and management of infections were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall infection rate was 9.3% (25/270) by patients and 6.8% (33/484) by episode/implants. The median time of infection after implantation was 64 days. Only 7/33 episodes (21.2%) occurred within 30 days after surgery, 22/33 episodes (66.7%) within 6 months and 28/33 episodes (84.8%) within 12 months. There was no age difference between infected and noninfected patients, while comorbidities were more frequent in the former. Infection rates before and after January 2003 were 14.3 and 4.9%, respectively. The rate of complete and partial hardware salvage was 30.3 and 21.2% while that of complete hardware removal was 48.5%. Patients with deep purulent infections and patients with Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism were more likely to have their hardware removed. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hardware infections declined significantly over time. Improvements in hardware and implantation techniques may be responsible. Hardware can often be completely or partly saved in infected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatia et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Deep brain stimulation (n=270). Deep brain stimulation surgery was evaluated on Hardware infection. Deep brain stimulation hardware infections occurred in 9.3% of patients, with the incidence declining significantly over time from 14.3% before January 2003 to 4.9% after.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: