Key result
Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data generates identical results to individual patient data.
Why the study?
Decision curve analysis requires individual patient data, limiting its application; Monte Carlo simulation offers a potential method to apply DCA using aggregate data.
Does Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data produce identical results to decision curve analysis based on individual patient data?
Does Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data produce identical results to decision curve analysis based on individual patient data?
Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data generates indistinguishable results from individual patient data DCA, facilitating wider use of DCA for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.
May enable broader DCA use with aggregate data alone; leaves open generalizability beyond the three models tested.
BACKGROUND: Decision curve analysis (DCA) is an increasingly used method for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models, but its application requires individual patient data. The Monte Carlo (MC) method can be used to simulate probabilities and outcomes of individual patients and offers an attractive option for application of DCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a MC decision model to simulate individual probabilities of outcomes of interest. These probabilities were contrasted against the threshold probability at which a decision-maker is indifferent between key management strategies: treat all, treat none or use predictive model to guide treatment. We compared the results of DCA with MC simulated data against the results of DCA based on actual individual patient data for three decision models published in the literature: (i) statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, (ii) hospice referral for terminally ill patients and (iii) prostate cancer surgery. RESULTS: The results of MC DCA and patient data DCA were identical. To the extent that patient data DCA were used to inform decisions about statin use, referral to hospice or prostate surgery, the results indicate that MC DCA could have also been used. As long as the aggregate parameters on distribution of the probability of outcomes and treatment effects are accurately described in the published reports, the MC DCA will generate indistinguishable results from individual patient data DCA. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a simple, easy-to-use model, which can facilitate wider use of DCA and better evaluation of diagnostic tests and predictive models that rely only on aggregate data reported in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hozo et al. (2017) studied this question. Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data vs. Decision curve analysis based on individual patient data was evaluated on Decision curve analysis results. Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data generated identical results to decision curve analysis based on actual individual patient data across three published decision models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: