Key result
Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery was associated with higher operative mortality compared with mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.23-2.39).
Why the study?
Comparisons of all temperature levels during aortic arch surgery have rarely been performed despite new concepts favoring moderate and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest over profound cooling.
Does moderate or mild hypothermic circulatory arrest reduce operative mortality and postoperative stroke in patients undergoing aortic arch surgery compared to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest?
Meta-Analysis (n=12,370)
Does moderate or mild hypothermic circulatory arrest reduce operative mortality and postoperative stroke in patients undergoing aortic arch surgery compared to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest?
Odds Ratio: 1.71 (95% CI 1.23–2.39)
Moderate to mild hypothermia strategies during aortic arch surgery are associated with decreased operative mortality and risk of postoperative stroke compared to deep hypothermia.
May support milder over deep hypothermia to reduce operative mortality in aortic arch surgery; extends meta-analytic evidence but requires randomized confirmation.
Objectives: New temperature management concepts of moderate and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery have gained weight over profound cooling. Comparisons of all temperature levels have rarely been performed. We performed direct and indirect comparisons of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (≤20°C), moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) (20.1°C to 25°C), and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (mild HCA) (≥25.1°C) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: The literature was systematically searched for all papers published through February 2022 reporting on clinical outcomes after aortic arch surgery utilizing DHCA, MHCA and mild HCA. The primary outcome was operative morality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative stroke and acute kidney failure (AKI). Results: A total of 34 studies were included, with a total of 12 370 patients. DHCA was associated with significantly higher postoperative incidence of stroke when compared with MHCA (odds ratio (OR), 1.46, 95% (confidence interval) CI, 1.19-1.78) and mild HCA: (OR, 1.50, 95% CI, 1.14-1.98). Furthermore, DHCA and MHCA were associated with higher operative mortality when compared with mild HCA (OR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.23-2.39 and OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.12-2.00, respectively). Separate analysis of randomized and propensity score matched studies showed sustained increased risk of stroke with DHCA in contrast to MHCA and mild HCA (OR, 1.61, 95% CI, 1.18-2.20, P-value = 0.0029 and OR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.09-2.77, P-value = 0.019). Conclusions: In the included studies, the moderate to mild hypothermia strategies were associated with decreased operative mortality and the risk of postoperative stroke. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted to further explore appropriate temperature management for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abjigitova et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Aortic arch surgery (n=12,370). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) vs. Mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (mild HCA) was evaluated on Operative mortality (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.23-2.39). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery was associated with higher operative mortality compared with mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.23-2.39).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: