Key result
ESH protocols identify all secondary hypertension cases, cutting costs ~76% versus extended work-ups.
Why the study?
Screening for secondary hypertension is not recommended for all hypertensive children, but missing these cases is critical and the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic protocols is uncertain.
Does a short diagnostic work-up or guideline-based protocol compare favorably to an extended work-up in identifying secondary hypertension and reducing costs in hypertensive children?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does a short diagnostic work-up or guideline-based protocol compare favorably to an extended work-up in identifying secondary hypertension and reducing costs in hypertensive children?
A simplified, focused diagnostic work-up or the ESH protocol can accurately identify secondary hypertension in children while significantly reducing costs compared to an extended work-up.
May support abbreviated protocols in hypertensive children; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Screening for secondary hypertension is not recommended for all hypertensive patients, but missing these cases is critical. We aimed to (i) assess hypertension causes in a cohort of hypertensive children, (ii) determine the costs and contributions of an extended diagnostic work-up to screen for secondary hypertension, and (iii) compare the performance of a "short diagnostic work-up" with the protocols of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 70 hypertensive patients aged 1-18 years. All underwent an extended work-up to exclude secondary hypertension. Diagnostic findings, test counts, and costs were analyzed. A short work-up (serum creatinine, fasting glucose, electrolytes, urinalysis, kidney ultrasound (US), and renal artery Doppler US), as well as the AAP and ESH protocols, was evaluated for performance and costs. RESULTS: Secondary hypertension was identified in 29 patients (41.4%). The extended protocol identified or excluded secondary causes in all patients. Kidney US had the highest diagnostic yield (37.1%). The short work-up and ESH protocol identified all secondary cases, whereas the AAP protocol missed 15 diagnoses. The extended protocol cost € 17,715.60 (€ 253.08 per patient). Direct cost savings were 64.3% with the short work-up, 92.4% with the AAP protocol, and 76.2% with the ESH protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Primary is more common than secondary hypertension in children, with kidney parenchymal disease being the leading secondary cause. As recommended by guidelines, a simplified, focused work-up may offer a cost-effective alternative to extensive screening while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guarino et al. (2025) conducted an observational in hypertension (n=70). Short diagnostic work-up vs. Extended diagnostic work-up was evaluated on Identification of secondary hypertension cases. A short diagnostic work-up and the ESH protocol identified all secondary hypertension cases, offering 64.3% and 76.2% cost savings respectively compared to an extended protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: