Key result
Peripheral artery disease was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant structural valve degeneration compared to patients without peripheral artery disease (7.3% vs. 0.0%, p=0.03).
Why the study?
The impact of peripheral artery disease on the development of bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration in patients with severe aortic stenosis was unclear.
Does peripheral artery disease increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients over 65 undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does peripheral artery disease increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients over 65 undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?
Peripheral artery disease is associated with a higher prevalence of structural valve degeneration in older patients following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.
PAD may warrant closer surveillance after bioprosthetic AVR; hypothesis-generating association requiring prospective confirmation before practice change.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the development of bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration (SVD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis.Background: Bioprosthetic valves, both open surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), are subject to structural valve degeneration which impacts valve durability.The impact of peripheral artery disease on the viability of bioprosthetic structural valves is unclear.Methods: We screened patients over the age of 65 years who had undergone bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements (SAVRs or TAVRs) for degenerative severe aortic stenosis between 2007 and 2013 in our institution.We retrospectively analyzed clinical and echocardiographic data collected within three months post intervention and at least 3.5 years post intervention to determine the rates of predefined structural valve degeneration.Results: Eighty-two patients were included in the PAD cohort and 72 patients were included in the non-PAD cohort.The PAD cohort had higher rates of hypertension and coronary artery disease.The two groups had similar mean pressure gradient, dimensionless valve index, and effective orifice area at baseline post-intervention and at follow-up.At follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the rates of clinically relevant SVD in the PAD patients versus non-PAD patients [6 (7.3%) vs. 0 (0.0%), p = 0.03].Conclusion: Our study suggests a greater prevalence of SVD in patients with PAD.Future confirmatory studies are needed to explore the impact of PAD and related co-morbidities on valve durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis post bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (n=154). Peripheral artery disease vs. No peripheral artery disease was evaluated on Clinically relevant structural valve degeneration (SVD) (p=0.03). Peripheral artery disease was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant structural valve degeneration compared to patients without peripheral artery disease (7.3% vs. 0.0%, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: