Key result
Early PCI in NSTE-ACS shows no association with fewer in-hospital or follow-up events.
Why the study?
The optimal timing of PCI for NSTE-ACS patients with chronic kidney disease is unclear.
Does early PCI improve in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS and chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=821)
Does early PCI improve in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS and chronic kidney disease?
Relative Risk: 1.06 (95% CI 0.83–1.36)
An early invasive strategy (PCI within 24 hours) does not independently improve in-hospital or long-term prognosis in patients with NSTE-ACS, including those with chronic kidney disease.
Early PCI shows no outcome association in NSTE-ACS with CKD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of PCI for NSTE-ACS with CKD is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess whether early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (within 24 hours from admission) is associated with improved in-hospital (mortality or acute kidney injury) and long-term events (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and bleeding events) in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: . A propensity score for the likelihood of an early invasive strategy was calculated. Relative risks (RR) and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for in-hospital and follow-up events. RESULTS: We included 821 patients, mean age was 69±12 years; 492 (60%) received an early PCI, and 273 (33%) had an eGFR <60. Median follow-up was 391 days. At univariate analysis, early treatment was associated with significantly lower in-hospital and follow-up events. However, after adjustment for major prognostic factors, there was no significant association with both in-hospital (RR=1.06; 95% CI 0.83-1.36) and follow-up events (RR=1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.37). When the association was assessed in strata of CKD, lack of statistically significant association was confirmed, even if a trend emerged in patients with preserved renal function both on primary outcome (RR=0.47, 95% 0.18-1.22) and time to secondary outcome (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.36-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion in a cohort of NSTE-ACS patients, an early invasive strategy does not independently affect prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a cohort in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=821). Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 24 hours from admission vs. Delayed or no early PCI was evaluated on In-hospital events (mortality or acute kidney injury) (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.36). An early invasive strategy (PCI within 24 hours) in patients with NSTE-ACS was not significantly associated with in-hospital events (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83-1.36) or follow-up events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: