Comparative field experiment reveals distinct photosynthetic and antioxidant adaptations in contrasting wheat genotypes, indicating protective mechanisms conferring drought tolerance.
Two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes contrasting in architectonics and differing in drought-resistance, Azamatli-95 (short-stemmed, with vertically oriented small leaves, drought-tolerant) andGiymatli-2/17 (short-stemmed, with broad and drooping leaves, drought-sensitive) were grown in fieldconditions in a wide area under normal water supply and severe water deficit. It was found out thatthe content of CPI (M, 115 kDa), apoprotein of P700 with M, 63 kDa and LHCII polypeptides insignifi-cantly increases in the drought-resistant Azamatli-95 under extreme water supply condition whiletheir content decreases in drought-sensitive Giymatli-2/17. The intensity of synthesis of a- and -subunits of CF, (55 and 53.5 kDa) and 33-30.5 kDa proteins also decreases in sensitive genotype. Theintensity of short wavelength peaks at 687 and 695 nm sharply increases in the fluorescence spectra(77K) of chloroplasts from Giymatli-2/17 under water deficiency and there is a stimulation of the ratioof fluorescence band intensity F687/F740. After exposure to drought Giymatli-2/17 shows a larger re-duction in the actual PSII photochemical efficiency of chloroplasts than Azamatli-95. The activitites ofantioxidant enzymes such as catalase, peroxidase, glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase dif-ferently change in wheat genotypes during ontogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huseynova et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: