This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The selection of the DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair pathway is decisive for genetic stability/instability. We proposed that it acts according to two successive steps: 1-canonical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) versus single-strand DNA (ssDNA) resection; 2- on ssDNA, gene conversion (GC) versus non-conservative single-strand annealing (SSA) or alternative end-joining (A-EJ). Using intramolecular substrates, we systematically analysed the equilibrium between the different DSB repair pathways. We show that ablation of RAD51 stimulated both SSA and A-EJ but did not stimulate C-NHEJ, validating the two-step model. Moreover, we found that two ATP-mutant dominant-negative forms of RAD51 that stimulated non-conservative repair, failed to load into damaged chromatin, clarifying the role of ATP in RAD51-mediated HR, also. In contrast, another dominant-negative form of RAD51, which retains its DNA binding capacities, repressed SSA and A-EJ, revealing two separable functions of RAD51 i.e. GC and non-conservative repair inhibition. I n vitro assays show that the binding of RAD51 on both complementary ssDNA is required to block both spontaneous and RAD52-induced strand annealing. Therefore, RAD51 represses non-conservative repair (SSA and A-EJ), by inhibiting the annealing step through ssDNA occupancy, independently of the catalytic strand-exchange activity required for GC.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: