Key result
Digitalis therapy linked to ~65% more appropriate shocks and higher mortality in ICD or CRT-D recipients.
Why the study?
Digitalis is widely used for heart failure therapy, but its association with adverse outcomes in ICD or CRT-D recipients remains unclear.
Does digitalis therapy increase the risk of appropriate shocks and mortality in ICD or CRT-D recipients?
Meta-Analysis (n=44,761)
Does digitalis therapy increase the risk of appropriate shocks and mortality in ICD or CRT-D recipients?
Digitalis use in patients with ICDs is associated with a higher risk of appropriate shocks and all-cause mortality, highlighting potential safety concerns in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Digitalis warrants caution in ICD/CRT-D recipients; meta-analysis leaves open causality and need for RCTs.
Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuo et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in ICD or CRT-D recipients (n=44,761). Digitalis vs. No digitalis was evaluated on Rate of appropriate shocks (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.46-1.86, p=<0.001). Digitalis therapy in ICD or CRT-D recipients was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.46-1.86; P<0.001) and higher all-cause mortality in ICD recipients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: