Key result
Cyclosporin-A worsens lesions and drives markedly higher infectious bursal disease virus titres in chickens.
Why the study?
The role of T lymphocytes in infectious bursal disease virus infection in chickens was investigated to understand their impact on disease pathogenesis.
Does T-cell suppression by cyclosporin-A enhance infectious bursal disease virus infection in experimentally infected chickens?
Does T-cell suppression by cyclosporin-A enhance infectious bursal disease virus infection in experimentally infected chickens?
Effect estimate: 1 to 2 log(10) higher virus titres
T cells play a role in limiting infectious bursal disease virus infection in chickens.
T-cell suppression may worsen experimental IBDV; hypothesis-generating for T-cell antiviral roles in avian models.
In this study, the role of T lymphocytes was investigated in chickens experimentally infected with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Chickens were treated with cyclosporin-A (CS-A), a selective T-cell suppressant drug, by the intramuscular route, starting 3 days before virus infection and every third day thereafter,and infectious bursal disease pathogenesis was compared in such T-cell suppressed and intact chickens using a vaccine strain; namely, Georgia and a field isolate of IBDV. Treatment of chickens with CS-A caused a significant suppression of phytohaemagglutinin-A specific proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The virus neutralizing antibody titres in such CS-A treated chickens were not suppressed. T-Cell suppression resulted in an increase in the severity of gross lesions caused by IBDV and extensive muscular haemorrhages were observed in such chickens between 15 and 21 days post-inoculation. Similarly, there was a marked increase in the severity of infectious bursal disease-specific microscopic lesions in the bursa of T-cell suppressed chickens. Consistently higher titres of virus were observed in bursa of CS-A treated chickens. Virus titres were 1 to 2 log(10) higher in the T-cell suppressed chickens as compared with the intact ones. These studies suggest that T cells play a role in limiting the IBDV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poonia et al. (2001) studied Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection. Cyclosporin-A (CS-A) vs. Intact chickens (no CS-A) was evaluated on Virus titres in bursa and severity of lesions (1 to 2 log(10) higher virus titres). T-cell suppression by cyclosporin-A in chickens infected with infectious bursal disease virus increased lesion severity and resulted in 1 to 2 log(10) higher virus titres compared to intact chickens.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: