Biogeographical analysis reveals high macroalgal beta diversity across Southwest Atlantic marine protected areas, highlighting species replacement over nested loss along latitudinal gradients.
Macroalgae provide key ecosystem services, forming habitats such as kelp and fucoid forests, rhodolith beds, and coralline reefs that sustain high biodiversity. However, multiple stressors, including climate change, harmful fishery practices, and pollution and coastal urbanization are driving macroalgal diversity loss and changing species composition and abundance. This study aims to assess macroalgal representativeness, richness and endemism in 16 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), including four oceanic islands, and test if macroalgal assemblages in MPAs are distributed along a latitudinal gradient (0–29° S) in the Southwest Atlantic. To investigate the processes underlying community patterns, β-diversity was decomposition turnover and nestedness components. The complexity of taxonomic structure was measured by taxonomic distinctness. Overall, the studied MPAs comprised 695 macroalgal taxa, about 69% of Brazilian taxa, and 36% of the endemics. Rhodophyta were dominant (449 species) in most studied areas, except at Trindade and Martim Vaz Archipelago MPA, followed by Chlorophyta (158 species) and Ochrophyta (88 species). Macroalgal species composition in MPAs varied with latitude, and not with area size. They were continuously distributed across northeastern, eastern and southeastern Brazil and oceanic island ecoregions, between Fernando de Noronha (3° S) and São Paulo Litoral Norte (23° S) MPAs. Macroalgal diversity dissimilarity among MPAs was 92%, dominated by the turnover component (88%) and nestedness as a minor component (4%), indicating that dissimilarities are mainly driven by the replacement of species, rather than a gradual loss or gain of species. Effective protection of these MPAs should be prioritized as they harbor highly diverse, unique, and heterogeneous macroalgal assemblages along the SWA, surrounded by heavily impacted areas. Assessment of human impacts on macroalgal habitats in MPAs would contribute to defining effective management actions. Mid- and offshore shelf macroalgal habitats, particularly rhodolith beds, which harbor rare kelp species and mesophotic reefs, remain underprotected, and should be integrated into marine spatial planning for biodiversity conservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: