Key result
Suboptimal BP control linked to ~185% greater all-cause mortality risk, amplified by concurrent high LDL-C.
Why the study?
The impact of combined blood pressure and LDL-C control compared to control of only one or none on mortality risk in hypertensive patients was not well studied.
Does combined lack of blood pressure and lipid control increase mortality in hypertensive patients without overt cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=2,380)
No
Does combined lack of blood pressure and lipid control increase mortality in hypertensive patients without overt cardiovascular disease?
Combined failure to achieve blood pressure and LDL-C targets significantly increases the risk of all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients without baseline cardiovascular disease.
Dual target failure was associated with higher mortality; leaves open whether combined BP-LDL control improves outcomes in primary-prevention hypertension.
Background Hypertension and dyslipidemia are well-known risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). In such patients, lowering blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and targeting to values below pre-specified cut-offs prevents CV events and improves prognosis. However, the impact of both BP and LDL-C control as compared to control of only one and/or none of these two risk factors is not well-studied. Methods Among 2,380 treated patients with hypertension and no overt CVD at baseline, we assessed the trajectory of BP control in 1,142 subjects with 4 or more follow up visits; BP control was defined as BP<140/90 mmHg in half or more visits. In the same subgroup, data on lipid control according to LDL-C goals were available in 1,032 patients in 2 or 3 visits. The HeartScore was used to estimate the risk of all-cause death at baseline. Results Across a median follow up of 108 months, 26 deaths (2.44%) were recorded. Despite appropriate anti-hypertensive treatment, 376 patients (32.92%) did not achieve conventional BP control in half or more of follow-up visits. Respectively, 59.83% of the study population did not meet the LDL-C goals in at least one assessment. Patients with suboptimal BP control had almost 3-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality (HR=2.85, 95% CI 1.31–6.21, P=0.008) as compared to subjects with effective control. This association was not attenuated after taking into account age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and diabetes mellitus (adjusted HR=2.54, 95% CI 1.13–5.72, P=0.025). Ineffective LDL-C control was not related to death (HR=1.31, 95% CI 0.688–2.48). However, patients who did not reach treatment goals for both BP and LDL showed substantially increased risk for all-cause mortality (HR=5.42, 95% CI 1.09–26.9, P=0.039). Importantly, suboptimal BP control in our cohort of hypertensive patients was associated with death independently of the HeartScore (adjusted HR=2.65, 95% CI 1.22–5.77, P=0.014) and conferred incremental reclassification value on top of the baseline risk (continuous NRI=0.467, P=0.016). Conclusions Suboptimal BP control was related to all-cause mortality in our cohort of hypertensive patients; importantly, this association was substantially stronger in concurrent presence of LDL-C values above treatment targets, thus, highlighting the need for combined achievement of BP and LDL-C control. Moreover, association of suboptimal BP controlwith death was independent of the HeartScore, suggesting that BP control should be considered in risk stratification of hypertensive patients Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magkas et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=2,380). Suboptimal blood pressure control vs. Effective blood pressure control was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.31-6.21, p=0.008). Suboptimal blood pressure control increased the risk of all-cause mortality compared to effective control (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.31-6.21; P=0.008), a risk further amplified by concurrent high LDL-C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: