Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the practice of Time Series [TS] forecasting there are very often situations where it is prudent to modify certain “outlier” values in the TS-Panel. A simple modification protocol is to replace selected TS-points by the Average of their adjacent Near-Neighbor-points [ANN]. Thus, a research question, not previously addressed and thus of interest, is: Are ANN-TS modifications balanced—50% of the time provoking OLS-forecasting variation, thus reducing the predicative acuity of the 95% Confidence Intervals; and, by symmetry, 50% of the time smoothing resulting in more predicative resolution. Research Plan To address this question, we: (i) collected accounting information to be forecasted from firms on the Bloomberg™ terminals for Income Statement and Balance Sheet sensitive variables, (ii) formed three ANN-modifications, and (iii) computed 95% Confidence Intervals using the firm-Panel and the three modified Panels. Results Regarding the research question, surprisingly the ANN-replacement protocols were not balanced. In fact, about 2/3 of the time the ANN was smoothing in nature, and thus about 1/3 of the time the ANN-protocol provoked OLS-variation. We discuss the important implication of this result for forecasting in the economic context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heilig et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: