Key result
Pressure-controlled ventilation reduces heart rate, MAP, and stress markers versus volume-controlled ventilation.
Why the study?
Prone positioning during posterior lumbar spine surgery may alter airway pressures and hemodynamics, and ventilation mode may modify these effects.
Does pressure-controlled ventilation reduce hemodynamic changes and stress response compared to volume-controlled ventilation in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery in the prone position?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
No
Does pressure-controlled ventilation reduce hemodynamic changes and stress response compared to volume-controlled ventilation in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery in the prone position?
Pressure-controlled ventilation is associated with a lower stress response and better hemodynamic stability than volume-controlled ventilation during prone lumbar spine surgery.
PCV may lower stress markers versus VCV in prone lumbar surgery; hypothesis-generating for clinical benefits pending larger trials.
Background: Prone positioning may induce alterations of airway pressures and hemodynamic that may affect intraoperative blood loss. Ventilation mode may modify these alterations. Objective: Our study aimed to differences between pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in their effects on hemodynamic changes during posterior lumbar surgeries performed in the prone position. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled study, which was performed in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical ICU, Aswan university, Egypt at the duration from 1-6-2017 to 13-12-2018 for 60 patients who had posterior lumbar spine surgery in prone position who were eligible to inclusion/exclusion criteria divided into two groups; Group (I) were received VCV mode (n = 30) and Group (II) were received PCV mode (n = 30) then study parameters were recorded intraoperatively and postoperatively in the two groups of ventilation modes. Results: As regarding heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, serum glucose level, and serum cortisol level, they were statistically significantly lower in PCV group than VCV group both intraoperative and postoperative which reflects that stress response is lower with PCV more than VCV and that may have also a rule in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and improving the surgical field in these surgeries. Conclusions: for lumbar spine surgeries in the prone position, PCV was associated with decreased HR, blood pressure, cortisol, glucose levels compared with VCV. The stress response is lesser with PCV which is better for this type of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragheb et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Posterior lumbar spine surgery in prone position (n=60). Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) vs. Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) was evaluated on Hemodynamic changes (heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure) and stress response (serum glucose and cortisol levels). Pressure-controlled ventilation significantly reduced heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, serum glucose, and serum cortisol levels compared to volume-controlled ventilation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: