Key result
Heart Model automated 3D algorithm shows good agreement with conventional 3D echocardiography for LVEDV.
Why the study?
Quantitative measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography is fundamental in pediatric diagnosis and prognosis, but validation of automated 3D analytic algorithms in this population is needed.
Does the automated 3D echocardiographic algorithm Heart Model accurately measure left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to conventional 3D echocardiography in pediatric patients?
Observational (n=75)
Does the automated 3D echocardiographic algorithm Heart Model accurately measure left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to conventional 3D echocardiography in pediatric patients?
The automated 3D echocardiographic algorithm Heart Model is a feasible and accurate tool for evaluating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in pediatric patients over 6 years old.
Supports automated LV analysis in children >6 years; leaves open prospective validation against CMR and clinical outcomes.
Introduction The quantitative measurement of the left ventricle by echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of acquired and congenital diseases in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to validate an automated three‐dimensional adaptive analytic echocardiographic algorithm, the so‐called Heart Model® (HM) in the pediatric population, using as comparators the left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction obtained by means of conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography. Methods Pilot study, where a population comprised of 75 consecutive patients aged 6–17 years who attended a pediatric cardiology clinic, was evaluated. Every patient underwent a conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography and an analysis using HM. Conventional 3D echo was used as the reference method. Results Seventy‐five patients were analyzed. Mean age was 11.2 (4.0) years (52.2% women). The intraclass correlation coefficient of HM vs 2D echo was poor, but it was good for the agreement between HM and 3D echo for left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97–0.99; P < 0.001), left ventricular end‐systolic volume ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99; P = 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (ICC: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78–0.92; P < 0.001). The agreement was also good for the three parameters when the analysis was performed according to body weight. Conclusions Heart Model® is a feasible and accurate tool for the evaluation of left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction in pediatric population aged above 6 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvajal-Rivera et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acquired and congenital heart diseases (n=75). Heart Model (automated three-dimensional adaptive analytic echocardiographic algorithm) vs. Conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography was evaluated on Agreement between Heart Model and 3D echocardiography for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ICC 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p=<0.001). The Heart Model automated 3D algorithm showed good agreement with conventional 3D echocardiography for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ICC 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: