Key result
Automated HeartModel matches expert manual 3D echocardiography for LVEF while cutting analysis time to ~20 seconds.
Why the study?
Does automated 3D echocardiography (HeartModel) accurately and rapidly measure left heart volumes and LVEF compared to expert manual assessment in Chinese adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=53)
Single-blind
No
Does automated 3D echocardiography (HeartModel) accurately and rapidly measure left heart volumes and LVEF compared to expert manual assessment in Chinese adolescents?
Automated 3D echocardiography using HeartModel provides rapid, accurate, and reproducible left heart chamber quantification in adolescents, significantly reducing analysis time compared to manual methods.
May support faster automated LVEF analysis in adolescents; extends validation to this group but leaves broader adoption open.
Background : Several studies have reported the accuracy and reproducibility of HeartModel for automated determination of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-derived left heart volumes and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) in adult patients. However, it remains unclear whether this automated adaptive analytics algorithm, derived from a ‘training’ population, can encompass adequate echo images in Chinese adolescents. Objectives : The aim of our study was to explore the accuracy of HeartModel in adolescents compared with expert manual three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Methods : Fifty-three Chinese adolescent subjects with or without heart disease underwent 3D echocardiographic imaging with an EPIQ system (Philips). 3D cardiac volumes and LVEF obtained with the automated HeartModel program were compared with manual 3D echocardiographic measurements by an experienced echocardiographer. Results : There was strong correlation between HeartModel and expert manual 3DE measurements ( r = 0.875–0.965, all P < 0.001). Automated LV and left atrial (LA) volumes were slightly overestimated when compared to expert manual measurements, while LVEF showed no significant differences from the manual method. Importantly, the intra- and inter-observer variability of automated 3D echocardiographic model was relatively low (<1%), surpassing the manual approach (3.5–17.4%), yet requiring significantly less analyzing time (20 ± 7 vs 177 ± 30 s, P < 0.001). Conclusion : Simultaneous quantification of left heart volumes and LVEF with the automated HeartModel program is rapid, accurate and reproducible in Chinese adolescent cohort. Therefore, it has a potential to bring 3D echocardiographic assessment of left heart chamber volumes and function into busy pediatric practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Masked hypertension, congenital heart disease, or healthy (n=53). HeartModel automated 3D echocardiography software vs. Expert manual 3D echocardiography was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD -0.3%, p=0.381). The automated HeartModel program yielded left ventricular ejection fraction results comparable to expert manual 3D echocardiography (MD -0.3%, p=0.381) and significantly reduced analysis time from 177 to 20 seconds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: