Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Data is reported from an ongoing trial considering functional losses in patients with high-risk drusen. We evaluate the temporal processing in 12 subjects: four patients with high-risk drusen, four age-matched controls and four young observers aged 22-30. METHODS: Subjects were tested using frequency-doubling technology, macula static and flicker fields on a Medmont perimeter and foveal temporal contrast sensitivity at 2, 5, 10 and 24 Hz. RESULTS: Eyes with high-risk drusen had good visual acuity (6/9.5(-2) or better). All control eyes had normal fields for static, flicker and frequency-doubling perimetry. All high-risk drusen eyes had normal static perimetry in the presence of abnormal flicker and frequency-doubling perimetry. High-risk drusen eyes showed a generalized loss of temporal sensitivity across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that eyes with high-risk drusen show losses to temporal stimuli in the presence of near-normal acuity and static thresholds. We suggest that flickering stimuli might be useful for detecting and monitoring such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phipps et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: