Key result
DPP4i administration in diabetic patients with type B intramural hematoma was associated with low rates of aorta-related adverse events (3.1%) and mortality (0.0%).
Why the study?
The influence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on the progression of type B intramural hematoma in patients with diabetes mellitus was unclear.
Does dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma?
Cohort (n=96)
Does dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma?
DPP4i administration in diabetic patients with type B intramural hematoma is associated with lower aorta-related mortality and more benign progression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DPP4i appears safe in diabetic type B intramural hematoma; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objectives Investigating whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) could influence the progression of type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods Uncomplicated IMHB patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify risk factors. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate all-cause and aorta-related mortality. Results Ninety-six matched IMHB patients were divided into Group A (n= 32, IMHB patients without DM), Group B (n= 32, IMHB patients with DMreceiving oral antidiabetic drugs [without DPP4i]) and Group C (n= 32, IMHB patients with DM receiving oral antidiabetic drugs [with DPP4i]). Group C had the lowest rate of aorta-related adverse events (3.1%), aorta-related mortality (0.0%) and reintervention (3.1%). Cox proportional hazard models revealed that a lower eosinophil count (per 0.1, HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29–0.79,P= 0.004) and a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05–1.21,P= 0.001) were associated with higher occurrences of aorta-related adverse events. A lower eosinophil count (per 0.1, HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18–0.89,P= 0.025) and a higher NLR (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08–1.32,P= 0.001) were also associated with increased aorta-related mortality. Conclusion DPP4i administration in DM patients with IMHB was associated with lower aorta-related mortality and more benign progression than in those who did not receive DPP4i or those without DM. Furthermore, a higher eosinophil count and a lower NLR ratio are potential protective factors that may explain the potential therapeutic benefit of DPP4i.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) in patients with diabetes mellitus (n=96). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) vs. IMHB patients without diabetes and IMHB patients with diabetes receiving oral antidiabetic drugs without DPP4i was evaluated on Aorta-related adverse events. DPP4i administration in diabetic patients with type B intramural hematoma was associated with low rates of aorta-related adverse events (3.1%) and mortality (0.0%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: