Key result
Combined MLPA and WES identifies pathogenic variants in ~81% of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.
Why the study?
Precise genetic diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy is required for timely intervention and treatment, but comprehensive genetic characterization remains challenging.
Does a combined MLPA and WES diagnostic approach improve genetic diagnosis and genotype-phenotype correlation in male patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Does a combined MLPA and WES diagnostic approach improve genetic diagnosis and genotype-phenotype correlation in male patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
p-value: p=<0.001
Combining MLPA and WES significantly improves the diagnostic yield for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and enables genotype-phenotype correlations, such as linking nonsense variants to a 2.5-fold increased risk of early cardiomyopathy.
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive X-linked disorder causing muscle degeneration and multisystem involvement, requiring precise genetic diagnosis for timely intervention and treatment. Objective: To investigate the genetic landscape of DMD using a two-tiered diagnostic approach combining MLPA and WES, and to correlate genetic findings with clinical outcomes for improved management. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 80 male DMD patients was conducted using a sequential genetic approach, combining MLPA and WES, with bioinformatics and statistical analyses to explore genotype-phenotype correlations. Results: Pathogenic variants were identified in 65 cases (81.2 %), with deletions (67.5 %) being the most common, followed by duplications (6.3 %), splice-site (3.8 %), and nonsense variants (3.8 %). WES identified additional pathogenic variants in MLPA-negative cases, including novel mutations, expanding the known genetic spectrum of DMD. The combined MLPA-WES approach significantly improved diagnostic yield (χ² = 12.90, p < 0.001). Functional analysis revealed disruptions in glycogen metabolism (46 %), calcium transport (24 %), and mitochondrial function (12 %), with dystrophin-associated proteins (DAG1, SGCD) critically involved in muscle stability. Out-of-frame deletions were significantly associated with early disease onset (χ² = 49.03, p < 0.001) and severe phenotypes (χ² = 47.04, p < 0.001), supporting exon-skipping therapy. In-frame deletions correlated with milder progression, while nonsense variants posed a 2.5-fold increased risk of early cardiomyopathy (p = 0.002), emphasizing the need for early intervention. Conclusion: Combining MLPA and WES enhances DMD diagnostic accuracy, enabling timely clinical interventions. Integrating functional analysis with genotype-phenotype correlations supports personalized therapeutic strategies, improving patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathur et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) (n=80). Combined MLPA and WES vs. MLPA alone was evaluated on Diagnostic yield of pathogenic variants (p=<0.001). A combined MLPA and WES diagnostic approach identified pathogenic variants in 81.2% of male patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, significantly improving diagnostic yield (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: