This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the two isotypic title compounds, C14H8BrCl2N3O2, (I), and C14H8Cl3N3O2, (II), the substitution of one of the phenyl rings is different [Br for (I) and Cl for (II)]. Aromatic rings form dihedral angles of 60.9 (2) and 64.1 (2)°, respectively. Molecules are linked through weak X...Cl contacts [X = Br for (I) and Cl for (II)], C—H...Cl and C—Cl...π interactions into sheets parallel to the ab plane. Additional van der Waals interactions consolidate the three-dimensional packing. Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structures indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing for (I) are from C...H/H...C (16.1%), O...H/H...O (13.1%), Cl...H/H...Cl (12.7%), H...H (11.4%), Br...H/H...Br (8.9%), N...H/H...N (6.9%) and Cl...C/C...Cl (6.6%) interactions, and for (II), from Cl...H / H...Cl (21.9%), C...H/H...C (15.3%), O...H/H...O (13.4%), H...H (11.5%), Cl...C/C...Cl (8.3%), N...H/H...N (7.0%) and Cl...Cl (5.9%) interactions. The crystal of (I) studied was refined as an inversion twin, the ratio of components being 0.9917 (12):0.0083 (12).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akkurt et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: