Key result
Platelet HMGB1 expression shows no association with death, MI, or LVEF in symptomatic CAD.
Why the study?
The role of platelet-derived HMGB1 in coronary artery disease remains unexplored.
Is HMGB1 expression level on circulating platelets associated with adverse outcomes in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=183)
Is HMGB1 expression level on circulating platelets associated with adverse outcomes in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
HMGB1 expression on circulating platelets does not appear to be a useful prognostic biomarker for adverse outcomes in patients with symptomatic CAD undergoing PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support platelet HMGB1 as prognostic biomarker in symptomatic CAD; leaves open its utility in other phenotypes or as therapeutic target.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Platelets express high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP) that triggers thrombosis and inflammation when present in extracellular space. The role of platelet-derived HMGB1 in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unexplored. METHODS: In a cohort study, we measured the expression of HMGB1 on the surface of circulating platelets in 183 patients with symptomatic CAD (stable CAD: n=80, acute coronary syndrome, ACS: n=103) at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients were tracked for course of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all-cause death (ACD), and myocardial infarction (MI) for 360 days after study inclusion. RESULTS: Platelet HMGB1 expression did not significantly differ between stable CAD, unstable CAD, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Moreover, platelet HMGB1 did not significantly correlate with LVEF, neither at baseline nor at 6 months follow-up of the MI subgroup, and did not exert any significant effect on outcome (composite of ACD and/or MI as well as single events ACD and MI). Cumulative event-free survival of patients was not significantly different between HMGB1 levels above the median and HMGB1 levels below or equal to the median. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that HMGB1 expressed on the surface of circulating platelets in patients with symptomatic CAD may not serve as a prognostic biomarker for this disease state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rath et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic coronary artery disease (n=183). HMGB1 expression on circulating platelets vs. HMGB1 levels below or equal to the median was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death and/or myocardial infarction. Platelet HMGB1 expression levels were not significantly associated with all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or left ventricular ejection fraction at 360 days in patients with symptomatic CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: