Key result
Aneurysmectomy cohort study evaluates outcomes and survival factors in elderly patients.
Why the study?
The study aimed to review the results of aneurysmectomy in aged patients and evaluate factors influencing survival after surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Cohort (n=100)
May support elective AAA repair in selected patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of survival benefit.
Before resection and graft replacement was introduced nearly two decades ago,1rupture and hemorrhage was a major cause of death in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.2,3 In large reported series, the operative mortality rate for elective aneurysmectomy has been reduced 4% to 7%.4-6Survival time has been significantly lengthened in the operated patients when compared with those followed without operation.7Resection and replacement is now generally accepted as the treatment of choice in patients whose life expectancy is not limited by other diseases.8,9 The purpose of this report is to review the results of aneurysmectomy in the aged patient, and to evaluate the preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors that influence survival. Materials and Methods One hundred patients ranging in age from 60 to 85 years were studied (Table 1). This group of patients was selected out of the total aneurysmectomy series on the basis of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albert D. Hall (1970) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=100). Aneurysmectomy was evaluated on Survival and factors influencing survival. Aneurysmectomy outcomes and factors influencing survival were evaluated in a cohort of 100 aged patients, though specific quantitative results are not reported in the truncated abstract.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: