Key result
Opioid stewardship review identifies guidelines, education, audits, and multidisciplinary teams as key program characteristics.
Why the study?
There is little concrete guidance on how to achieve opioid stewardship goals or define the roles of healthcare professionals in opioid stewardship programs.
This integrative review collates best practices for opioid stewardship programs to optimize pain management and minimize adverse consequences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide opioid stewardship implementation; leaves open prospective validation of component efficacy.
The opioid crisis in the United States continues to take the lives of tens of thousands of Americans each year. Opioid medications are important components of acute pain management and opioid stewardship is necessary to mitigate opioid misuse while providing adequate pain control for patients with severe medical needs. The definition of opioid stewardship includes the use of evidence-based guidelines, policies, and patient-centered practices to promote appropriate prescribing, use, and deprescribing of opioids to optimize treatment and minimize adverse consequences. There is little concrete guidance about how to achieve these goals or define the role and importance of various healthcare professionals in opioid stewardship programs. An integrative review process was used to evaluate and collate best practices in opioid stewardship from a variety of published papers. The integrative review was chosen to be inclusive of papers outside of quantitative research, allowing for interpretation of qualitative research, position statements, reports, editorials, and opinions. Data extraction included 71 publications that revealed common characteristics that can improve and coalesce opioid stewardship programs. Top characteristics and themes developed include prescribing guidelines, patient and provider education, referral and consultation, prescribing audits, barriers to opioid stewardship, the use of multidisciplinary teams and non-physician healthcare providers, accountability, risk of misuse, access to care, and patient-centeredness. The use of electronic health record tools, decision support tools, patient screening and discharge standards, and opioid tapering were recommended. Open and consistent communication between patients and healthcare providers is deemed essential. Staffing resources were found to be a significant barrier to opioid stewardship. This integrative review of publications related to opioid stewardship seeks to provide a comprehensive list of best practices that can be incorporated into programs to streamline processes and contribute to an organized foundation that can be used in research to illuminate practices that lead to enhanced outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2024) conducted a review in Opioid stewardship (n=71). Opioid stewardship programs was evaluated on Characteristics and themes of opioid stewardship programs. An integrative review of 71 publications identified key characteristics of opioid stewardship, including prescribing guidelines, patient and provider education, prescribing audits, and multidisciplinary teams.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: