We evaluated a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) microsensor array with temperature-controlled chemi-resistive elements for use as a noninvasive clinical diagnostic tool to detect the presence or absence of trace amounts of disease biomarkers in simulated breath samples. The microsensor environment was periodically altered between air (78% N2, 21% O2by volume, 20% relative humidity) and simulated breath (77% N2, 16% O2, 4% CO2by volume, 80% relative humidity) samples creating a dynamic background. Acetone, a disease marker for diabetes, was spiked into select simulated breath samples at relevant concentrations ( 0.5 ¿mol/mol to 8 ¿mol/mol) to pose a diagnostic problem for the sensor array. Using standard statistical dimensionality reduction and classification algorithms, we compared the ability of a variety of sensing materials to detect and recognize the disease marker. Our analyses indicate that the porous, doped nanoparticle materials (Sb:SnO2microshell films and Nb :TiO2nanoparticle films) are best for the recognition problem (acetone present versus absent), but that WO3and SnO2films are better at the quantification task (high versus low concentrations of acetone).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benkstein et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: