Key result
Observational analysis tracks contemporary DOAC spending patterns within Medicare and Medicaid from 2014 to 2019.
Why the study?
Given the rising use of DOACs, the many anticoagulation indications requiring lifelong therapy, and the lack of generic DOAC formulations, contemporary DOAC spending patterns were examined.
Observational
This study examines contemporary DOAC spending patterns within Medicare Part D and Medicaid between 2014 and 2019.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive DOAC spending trends in public programs may flag access concerns; leaves open cost-effectiveness and policy research.
ince the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), multiple large studies have demonstrated that DOACs are more effective, have fewer bleeding risks, and require less monitoring when compared with warfarin. 1Given the rising use of DOACs, the many anticoagulation indications that require lifelong therapy and the current lack of generic DOAC formulations, we examine contemporary DOAC spending patterns within Medicare Part D and Medicaid between 2014 and 2019.All three data sets used are publicly available and are readily accessible at https://www.cms.gov/Research-Stati stics -Data-and-Syste ms/Stati stics -Trend s-and-Repor ts/Infor matio n-on-Presc ripti on-Drugs/ Medic arePartD, https://www.cms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duvalyan et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Anticoagulation indications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was evaluated on DOAC spending patterns.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: