Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study demonstrates high sensitivity but suboptimal specificity for the TB-Feron assay in Vietnamese cohorts, indicating potential as a near-point-of-care diagnostic tool.
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) infection is a driver of the global TB epidemic. Accurate, affordable, and simpler diagnostics are crucial for identifying people for preventive therapy. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the STANDARD F TB-Feron FIA (TB-Feron), a near-point-of-care (POC) assay for detecting TB infection. METHODS: From June to December 2024, we conducted a cross-sectional study at the Vietnam National Lung Hospital, enrolling 352 participants, including 345 eligible participants: 95 with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (Group 1), 200 household contacts of people with pulmonary TB (Group 2), and 50 with a recent history of a negative QFT-Plus result and no known TB exposure (Group 3). Participants were tested with TB-Feron and the reference standard, QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus). Results were compared for sensitivity and specificity (primary endpoints), with inter-test agreement (Cohen's κ) and reproducibility (Bland-Altman analysis) as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 345 eligible participants, TB-Feron sensitivity was 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.2-94.1) in Group 1, and specificity was 70.0% (55.4-82.1) in Group 3. In Group 2, positive and negative agreements with QFT-Plus were 89.2% (79.8-95.2%) and 75.4% (66.9-82.6), respectively, with inter-test agreement of 80.5% (Cohen's κ=0.6069, P < .0001). Intra-test reproducibility showed no significant differences in IFN-γ levels (mean difference = 2.08 IU/mL, 95% CI -1.28 to 5.44, P = .206). CONCLUSIONS: With high sensitivity, the TB-Feron assay is a potential near-POC alternative to the QFT-Plus assay for diagnosing TB infection, but requires consideration of its suboptimal specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: