Key result
Automated U-Net CNN segmentation achieves a 0.89 median Dice score versus manual four-chamber methods.
Why the study?
Manual segmentation of four-chamber cine CMR images is time-consuming and subjective, necessitating evaluation of automated segmentation methods.
Does fully automated segmentation using a U-Net CNN accurately segment the four cardiac chambers on 4CH cine CMR compared to manual segmentation?
Does fully automated segmentation using a U-Net CNN accurately segment the four cardiac chambers on 4CH cine CMR compared to manual segmentation?
Deep learning with a U-Net CNN provides accurate, fully automated segmentation of all four cardiac chambers on cine CMR, potentially eliminating time-consuming manual analysis.
Four-chamber (4CH) cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) facilitates simultaneous evaluation of cardiac chambers; however, manual segmentation is time-consuming and subjective in practice. We evaluated deep learning based on a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated segmentation of the four cardiac chambers using 4CH cine CMR. Cine CMR datasets from patients were randomly assigned for training (1400 images from 70 patients), validation (600 images from 30 patients), and testing (1000 images from 50 patients). We validated manual and automated segmentation based on the U-Net CNN using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ); p < 0.05 was statistically significant. The overall median DSC showed high similarity (0.89). Automated segmentation correlated strongly with manual segmentation in all chambers—the left and right ventricles, and the left and right atria (end-diastolic area: ρ = 0.88, 0.76, 0.92, and 0.87; end-systolic area: ρ = 0.81, 0.81, 0.92, and 0.83, respectively; p < 0.01). The area under the curve for the left ventricle, left atrium, right ventricle, and right atrium showed high scores (0.96, 0.99, 0.88, and 0.96, respectively). Fully automated segmentation could facilitate simultaneous evaluation and detection of enlargement of the four cardiac chambers without any time-consuming analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arai et al. (2022) studied Patients undergoing four-chamber cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (n=150). Fully automated segmentation with a U-Net convolutional neural network vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) between automated and manual segmentation (median DSC 0.89, p=< 0.01). Fully automated segmentation using a U-Net CNN showed high similarity to manual segmentation across all four cardiac chambers, with an overall median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.89.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: