Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Mid-Cenomanian Event 1 (MCE 1) is a globally recognised positive carbon-isotope (δ 13 C) excursion of about 1 ‰ that occurred during the middle Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous). Characterized by a distinctive double-peaked δ 13 C signal, it is recorded in marine carbonate and terrestrial organic matter archives worldwide. MCE 1 reflects major perturbations of the global carbon cycle, accompanied by changes in ocean circulation, productivity, and oxygenation. This study presents a new record of MCE 1 from the expanded Vergons section (Vocontian Basin, southeastern France). The section is correlated with the nearby Blieux section using macrofossils and stable-isotope data, and with the Folkestone section (southeastern England), which provides comparable planktonic foraminiferal, isotopic, and macrofossil records. The studied interval spans the upper Thalmanninella globotruncanoides , T. greenhornensis , and lower Rotalipora cushmani zones. Both sections record the appearance of double-keeled, meso-eutrophic Dicarinella species and diversification within the Rotalipora lineage, indicating rapid turnover in single-keeled, oligotrophic taxa. However, differences in the lowest occurrence of R. cushmani and Dicarinella raise questions about their reliability for global correlation. Integrated biostratigraphic, isotopic (δ 13 C and δ 18 O), and sedimentological data reveal contrasting environmental responses across Boreal and Tethyan settings. At Folkestone, cooling episodes associated with positive δ 18 O excursions and Boreal macrofaunal markers suggest incursions of cold, low-salinity waters from the Norwegian Sea that enhanced productivity through water-column mixing, contributing to elevated δ 13 C values. At Vergons, similar cooling trends occurred without Boreal fauna, reflecting its upper-slope Tethyan setting and a more moderate ecological response. These results highlight ocean circulation as a key driver of MCE 1 with continental weathering and runoff providing additional influence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petrizzo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: