Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Some of the structural earthquake-disaster mitigation programs implemented in developing countries are evaluated, with an emphasis on Latin America. Recommendations for reducing the vulnerability of engineered construction include the following: (1) promote the use of structural systems with a built-in large seismic capacity; (2) avoid the adoption among practitioners of new building technologies without a previous process of review and assimilation; (3) develop specific design and rehabilitation requirements for critical facilities; (4) implement codes of different levels of complexity; (5) improve the expertise of building officials; and (6) apply financial and tax incentives. For nonengineered buildings, recommendations include the following: (1) encourage the participation of building owners and develop specific training programs for them; (2) promote the use of structural solutions akin to the local practice; (3) encourage the participation of local universities and professional associations; (4) take advantage of periods of hyperreceptivity immediately following severe earthquakes; (5) develop small-scale pilot studies; (6) disseminate the successes attained in similar areas and conditions; (7) implement economic incentives (suitable materials at reduced prices and temporary employment for masons); and (8) link vulnerability-reduction tasks to other actions aimed at improving housing habitability and durability, and at reducing poverty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meli et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: