Key result
CMR detects myocarditis in 46% of asymptomatic patients recently recovered from COVID-19.
Why the study?
Cardiac involvement in patients recovered from COVID-19 without clinical evidence of myocarditis was unclear and required assessment using non-invasive imaging modalities.
Do CMR and 2D STE accurately detect subclinical myocarditis in patients recovered from COVID-19?
Observational (n=50)
Yes
Do CMR and 2D STE accurately detect subclinical myocarditis in patients recovered from COVID-19?
CMR and 2D STE are highly accurate tools for detecting subclinical myocarditis, which was found to be present in nearly half of patients recently recovered from COVID-19.
Subclinical myocardial changes may persist post-COVID recovery; leaves open whether routine STE or CMR screening alters management in asymptomatic patients.
Objective: To assess cardiac involvement in patients recovered from COVID-19 with no clinical evidence of myocarditis, using various non-invasive parameters including Transthoracic Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Cardiology Departments of Maadi Military Hospital and Benha University Hospitals. A total of 74 patients were initially enrolled during their hospital stay, but only 50 of them met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The CMR examination was performed in conjunction with echocardiography, ECG, and laboratory investigations on the same day, which occurred 2-12 weeks after recovering from confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patient scheduling for CMR and other examinations depended on the availability of the CMR machine. Results: According to CMR diagnosis, 23 (46%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by CMR, the patients were categorized into two groups based on these results: normal group (27 patients) & myocarditis group (23 patients). According to GLS, 21 (42%) patients were diagnosed to have myocarditis by STE (diagnosis of Myocarditis with Global longitudinal strain was considered with cut-off point of >-21.33 with Sensitivity of 91.30% and Specificity of 92.59% (P <0.0001). 2D STE showed 87.50% sensitivity, 92.31% specificity and 90.00% accuracy to diagnose myocarditis, while CMR showed a 95.83% sensitivity, 96.15% specificity of and 96.00% accuracy. Conclusion: Myocarditis was found in 46% of asymptomatic COVID-19-recovered patients. CMR is a valuable tool for early myocarditis detection when combined with 2D STE, offering high accuracy. Significant differences were observed between suspected myocarditis patients and those with normal results on both 2D STE and CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed Ibrahim Awadeen (2023) conducted an observational in Recovered from COVID-19 (n=50). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) vs. Normal CMR findings was evaluated on Prevalence of myocarditis detected by CMR. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging detected evidence of myocarditis in 46% of asymptomatic patients who had recently recovered from COVID-19.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: