Key result
Indian AV annular dimensions are generally smaller than standard Western values across most BSAs.
Why the study?
Differences in aortic valve annular dimension relative to body surface area between Indian and western populations may cause patient prosthesis mismatch during aortic valve replacement surgeries.
Cross-Sectional (n=406)
Aortic valve annular dimensions in the Indian population differ significantly from standard western values across various body surface areas, which may impact prosthesis selection during aortic valve replacement.
May warrant ethnicity-specific annular references for AVR sizing in Indian patients; leaves open need for prospective outcome validation.
AIM: The Aortic Valve (AV) annular dimension with respect to the Body Surface Area (BSA) of the Indian population is compared against the standard values. Presence of discrepancies can lead to patient prosthesis mismatch during aortic valve replacement surgeries. METHODS: This study was conducted on 406 subjects. AV diameter was examined by using parasternal long axis view, where the imaging plane transects the AV in an anteroposterior direction and its x axis is aligned parallel to the long axis of aorta. Data were statistically analysed with western population. RESULTS: The AV dimension ranged from 12.2 mm to 21.2 mm in the BSA range of 0.6 to 1.9 m(2), showing a linear increase in diameter with increasing BSA. There was an increase of about 2 mm, from 0.61 - 0.7 m(2) BSA to 0.71 - 0.8 m(2) BSA. A linear increase which ranged from 0.3 to 1 mm was observed for BSA which ranged from 0.81 m(2) to 1.2 m(2). In the BSA range of 1.21 - 1.3 m(2), there was an increase of 1.5 mm. A steady increase which ranged from 0.4-1 mm was observed in the BSA which ranged from 1.31- 1.9 m(2). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference between Indian and western population in the aortic dimension, in the body surface ranges of 0.61-0.7, 1.11-1.2, 1.21-1.3, 1.51-1.6, 1.61-1.7, 1.71-1.8 and 1.8-1.9 m(2). In the range of 1.21-1.3 m(2), the diameter was larger than standard, whereas in all the other ranges, AV diameter was smaller than standard values. BSA, as a good predictor of AV dimension, has also been proved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannah Sugirthabai Rajila Rajendran (2013) reported a cross-sectional. Indian population vs. Standard values (western population) was evaluated on Aortic Valve (AV) annular dimension. Aortic valve annular dimensions in the Indian population differ significantly from standard western values across most body surface area ranges, generally being smaller than standard values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: