Key result
Rapid IV epoprostenol initiation linked to ~9 mmHg lower mPAP vs slow initiation in advanced PAH.
Why the study?
There is no widely accepted standard method for initiating intravenous epoprostenol therapy in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Does rapid initiation of intravenous epoprostenol improve hemodynamics compared to slow initiation in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Cohort (n=42)
No
Does rapid initiation of intravenous epoprostenol improve hemodynamics compared to slow initiation in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Rapid initiation of intravenous epoprostenol therapy provides superior hemodynamic improvements compared to slow initiation in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform initial IV epoprostenol dosing in advanced PAH; leaves open need for prospective validation of optimal protocol.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous infusion (IVI) of epoprostenol is an effective treatment for patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, there is no widely accepted standard method for initiating the IVI therapy. This study evaluated the hemodynamic improvements achieved with IVI epoprostenol to determine the optimal protocol for treatment initiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 42 consecutive PAH patients who underwent IVI epoprostenol in Keio University Hospital from 2001 to 2013. The study group comprised 30 women with a mean age of 34.3 ± 1.9 years. The etiology of PAH was idiopathic or heritable PAH (I/HPAH) in 38 cases, PAH associated with connective tissue disease in 3, and Eissenmenger's syndrome in the remaining case. We divided the patients into rapid- and slow-initiation therapy groups according to the cumulative epoprostenol dose administered during the first 180 days, and compared the hemodynamic changes between the groups. The median cumulative doses were 6142 ± 165 μg/kg and 3998 ± 132 μg/kg epoprostenol, respectively. While there were no significant differences in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), or cardiac index (CI) between the groups before the IVI epoprostenol therapy, the rapid-initiation therapy group achieved significant improvements in these hemodynamic data compared with the slow-initiation therapy group (P < 0.005) at the follow-up right-heart catheterization (RHC). CONCLUSION: Rapid initiation of IVI epoprostenol therapy achieved the optimal hemodynamic improvements in patients with severe PAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=42). Rapid initiation of intravenous epoprostenol vs. Slow initiation of intravenous epoprostenol (< 4700 μg/kg cumulative dose in initial 180 days) was evaluated on Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) at follow-up right-heart catheterization (p=<0.005). Rapid initiation of intravenous epoprostenol therapy significantly improved mean pulmonary artery pressure (44.6 vs 53.4 mmHg) and other hemodynamic parameters compared to slow initiation in patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: