Key result
The David & Wendy EMR proforma cuts ward round documentation time by ~48% and improves quality.
Why the study?
Surgical ward round documentation is often completed poorly despite being essential for high-quality patient care, and electronic medical record proformas may improve documentation quality and speed.
Does the 'David & Wendy' proforma improve the quality and speed of ward round documentation compared to standard documentation?
Cohort (n=711)
Single-blind (pre-intervention only)
No
Does the 'David & Wendy' proforma improve the quality and speed of ward round documentation compared to standard documentation?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.28% vs 60.05%
p-value: p=<0.001
The introduction of a structured electronic proforma significantly improved the speed and comprehensiveness of surgical ward round documentation.
Proforma use was associated with improved surgical ward round documentation; leaves open impact on patient outcomes or safety.
Background Surgical ward round documentation, essential for high-quality patient care, is often completed poorly. The advent of electronic medical records offers an opportunity to introduce proformas, aiding junior staff in completing notes both timely and accurately. We aimed to assess whether the introduction of a proforma would improve the quality and speed of ward round documentation. Methods We completed a prospective cohort analysis of ward round documentation at a single institution. Analysis was conducted on the documentation of a single surgical team over a 10-week period, comprising five weeks of baseline data collection followed by five weeks with implementation of a proforma. This proforma was based on the "David & Wendy" acronym, encompassing diet, activity, vital signs, investigations/IV therapy, drains/lines, wound assessment, examination findings, nursing concerns, drugs/deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, and barriers to discharge. Results A total of 711 ward round notes were analyzed, 349 with proforma and 362 without. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the documentation of diet, activity, investigations/IV therapy, drains/lines, wound assessment, nursing concerns, drugs/DVT prophylaxis, and barriers to discharge (p < 0.05) with proforma use. No significant difference was noted in the documentation of vital signs or examination findings. The time taken to finalize ward round notes was significantly reduced with the proforma (M = 31.28 vs. 60.05 minutes, p < 0.001). Conclusion The introduction of the David & Wendy proforma significantly improved the speed and quality of documentation for key surgical ward round information during our study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Surgical admission (n=711). "David & Wendy" ward round documentation proforma vs. Standard documentation without proforma was evaluated on Time taken to finalize ward round notes (minutes) (p=<0.001). The introduction of the "David & Wendy" proforma significantly reduced the mean time taken to finalize surgical ward round notes from 60.05 to 31.28 minutes and improved documentation of key clinical parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: