Key result
Ticagrelor pretreatment linked to less periprocedural myocardial injury vs post-angiography loading in early PCI.
Why the study?
The impact of immediate ticagrelor preloading on periprocedural myocardial injury in NSTEMI patients undergoing early invasive strategy was uncertain.
Does ticagrelor pretreatment reduce periprocedural myocardial injury in NSTEMI patients undergoing early invasive strategy?
Cohort (n=319)
Does ticagrelor pretreatment reduce periprocedural myocardial injury in NSTEMI patients undergoing early invasive strategy?
p-value: p=0.026 and 0.022
Immediate preloading with ticagrelor before coronary angiography may reduce periprocedural myocardial injury in NSTEMI patients undergoing an early invasive strategy.
May support pretreatment in early invasive NSTEMI; hypothesis-generating observational data requiring RCT confirmation.
Pretreatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor blocker (before coronary angiography) versus treatment in the catheterization laboratory has been a matter of debate in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of an immediate preloading strategy with ticagrelor on periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI treated with an early invasive strategy. NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 24 hours after hospital admission were divided into 2 groups: the first group (pretreatment group) included patients who received ticagrelor pretreatment as soon as possible after admission and the second group (no pretreatment group) included patients who received a loading dose of ticagrelor after coronary angiography. The pretreatment group included 232 patients, and the no pretreatment group included 87 patients. Male patients represented the majority of the patients. The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics, except for a greater incidence of hypertension ( P = 0.014) and higher hemoglobin levels ( P = 0.01) in the pretreatment group in comparison with the no pretreatment group. Patients in the ticagrelor pretreatment group had less myocardial injury until coronary angiography based on troponin measurements collected at 12 hours after admission ( P = 0.025). Patients in the ticagrelor pretreatment group also had fewer periprocedural myocardial injuries based on troponin measurements taken between 12 and 24 hours after the PCI ( P = 0.026 and P = 0.022, respectively). Our findings suggested that ticagrelor pretreatment reduces periprocedural myocardial injury in NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours after admission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaca et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (n=319). Ticagrelor pretreatment vs. Ticagrelor loading dose after coronary angiography was evaluated on Periprocedural myocardial injury based on troponin measurements between 12 and 24 hours after PCI (p=0.026 and 0.022). Ticagrelor pretreatment before coronary angiography reduced periprocedural myocardial injury compared to loading after angiography in NSTEMI patients undergoing early PCI (P=0.026 and P=0.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: