Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mesoporous molecular sieve Co–MCM-41 containing different cobalt contents, prepared by the hydrothermal synthesis method with cobalt nitrate as the cobalt source, was confirmed by characterization with X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum, and nitrogen adsorption–desorption. The characterization results indicated that the well-ordered mesostructure had been obtained and Co had been introduced into the framework of MCM-41. Adsorption removing basic nitrogen compounds from fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) diesel oil was studied by the static stirring method over MCM-41 and Co–MCM-41. Every gram of Co–MCM-41(0.06) adsorbent could adsorb 9.11 mg of nitrogen, while for MCM-41, this value was 7.36 mg of nitrogen/g of adsorbent, indicating that the adsorptive denitrogenation of Co–MCM-41(0.06) had been enhanced obviously. However, the adsorptive denitrogenation capacity of Co–MCM-41 decreased when Co/Si (mol) exceeded 0.06. It was due to the fact that excessive Co could disperse in the channel of Co–MCM-41 as Co 3 O 4 and block the adsorption active sites. The results of treated FCC diesel oil measured by gas chromatography–nitrogen chemiluminescence detector (GC–NCD) indicated that 82.21% basic nitrogen compound anilines, 44.68% weakly alkaline indoles, and 24.43% non-basic nitrogen compound carbazoles had been removed, which illustrated that Co–MCM-41(0.06) had high selectivity toward the basic nitrogen compounds. The results of adsorptive denitrogenation from FCC diesel oil using the dynamic adsorption method showed that, for a breakthrough point of 10 μg/g, the breakthrough volume and breakthrough capacity for Co–MCM-41(0.06) at ambient conditions were 15.2 mL/g of adsorbent and 3.09 mg of nitrogen/g of adsorbent, respectively. While for MCM-41, these data were only 0.9 mL/g and 0.18 mg of nitrogen/g of adsorbent, respectively, indicating that MCM-41 almost lost all of the adsorptive denitrogenation capacity as a result of the weak selectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: